Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 20:04:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other seems best suited for a postcard.
Info St. Paul's Cathedral, completed in 1846, is the seat of the Diocese of Huron and the oldest church in London, Ontario, Canada. The church is still extant, but the view shown here is blocked entirely by trees these days. While browsing historical postcards during a recent trip, I saw this item and thought the mood of the winter night, the turn-of-the-century artstyle, and the detailed depiction of the church and its supporting buildings was excellent. (Even better, the post-mark on the reverse gives a very explicit publication date for copyright status).
- Created by Red Star News Co., London, Ontario – scanned, uploaded, restored, and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 17:50:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Japan
Info The Soho, Tokyo. Taken by Pierre Blaché – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 19:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Great colors. Yann (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Very striking. However, Template:FoP-Japan should be used as the building seems to be new enough to still be in copyright. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:08, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support A truly striking image with amazing colors and a strong visual impact. Imho, it is a great find and worth a careful technical refinement. I have prepared a slightly improved version as a suggestion. I adjusted the image at 100% view to reduce visible noise, refine sharpness, and minimize the slight blur on the left side. If you think this version could be useful for the nomination, you are very welcome to download it here via SwissTransfer and upload it as a new version. Of course, please use it only if you consider it an improvement :) -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Obviously better. I've used it. Thanks
! Юрий Д.К. 20:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Obviously better. I've used it. Thanks
Support Excellent colors, lighting and composition. Acroterion (talk) 02:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 17:50:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
Info Hungarian Parliament Building at blue hour. Taken by Pierre Blaché – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 17:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 19:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support: wow indeed! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 17:40:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Rakibulalamkhanbd – uploaded by Rakibulalamkhanbd – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen (keep talking) 17:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Moheen (keep talking) 17:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment A great idea and well composed, but the upper levels are lost in the darkness and are important - is there any way to recover some of that detail? Acroterion (talk) 02:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 09:16:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal
Info Façade of one of the interior gardens of Hospital da Luz, Lisboa. Along the lines of some other featured pictures (such as this old one, but with a twist. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: excellent motif, but lots of blown highlights. Fixable?.. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Info I don't think so. The whites are close to it, according to my image processor, but not really blown. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)*
Support
- Well, that's the thing, the beams and columns shouldn't be white, compare their colour at the bottom of the photo. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 08:59:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support не ли е за WLM во септември ? Mile (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)--
- Веќе ми беше подигната. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 08:07:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 08:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Yet another wonderful Mandelbrot set image. But honestly, the Mandelbrot set is infinite but self-similar, and I don't want to see infinitely more images of it. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose -- I agree with Uoaei1; that's exactly right. Je-str (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Agree, we have gazillon of them. They are nice anyway. Mile (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)--
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:15, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2026 at 07:54:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info One of the deepest images of the Small Magellanic Cloud, with the foreground globular cluster 47 Tucanae at the upper right. Created by CTIO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/SMASH (Survey of the MAgellanic Stellar History) /D. Nidever (Montana State University) using the 4 meter Víctor M. Blanco Telescope – processed by Travis Rector (University of Alaska Anchorage), Mahdi Zamani & Davide de Martin – uploaded by Fabian RRRR – nominated by me —brainandforce [yap] 07:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Currently no FPs of the Milky Way's second biggest satellite galaxy! —brainandforce [yap] 07:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but the nomination should be updated, the JPG version has been uploaded by @Fabian RRRR: , not by my bot. vip (talk) 08:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support and nom. updated. Yann (talk) 09:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 21:50:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Crocodylidae_(Crocodiles)
Info all by me – -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:50, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Dwarf crocodile (Osteolaemus tetraspis) in the terrarium building of Wuppertal Zoo, Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany; photographic technique: focus stacking, hand-held
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:50, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose - While I appreciate the difficulty of shooting handheld in an indoor setting, the OOF ridges on the far side of the head are distracting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 21:27:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Guardian Angel chapel (baptismal chapel) of St. Lorenz Basilica in Kempten (Allgäu), Bavaria: baptismal font with a figure of John the Baptist, behind it the Guardian Angel altar with an oval altarpiece (a guardian angel guiding a child towards the personification of Faith) and the Eye of Providence above, flanked by the epitaphs of prince-abbots Rupert von Bodman (d. 1728, left) and Engelbert von Syrgenstein (d. 1760, right)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:13, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment - Very nice, and I'd like to support, but there is a slight horizontal lean. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review. Please take another look, Chris Woodrich. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know if it's a cache issue, but I'm not seeing a difference. I'll try revising on a different computer. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- There seem to be an cache issue. I see an older photo from a mountain (wrong upload) not the current photo. Strange... --Tuxyso (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm getting the mountain on my work computer, which has never opened this file before. I am finding that Commons isn't showing updates as quickly as it used to, but I don't know if that's just me or if there is actually a technical issue.
Support In the interim. It was a slight tilt, and the thumbnail at least looks straighter. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- There seem to be an cache issue. I see an older photo from a mountain (wrong upload) not the current photo. Strange... --Tuxyso (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know if it's a cache issue, but I'm not seeing a difference. I'll try revising on a different computer. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 19:52:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Corvidae#Genus_:_Corvus
Info Just a portrait of a friendly common raven (Corvus corax). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Nice bokeh and sharpness! Could you adjust the exposure down a bit? It seems slightly overexposed to me, and I think the empty space on the left doesn't make for too good of a crop. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think I'll wait for a few more opinions to come in before attempting a change. I played with crops and tone settings before settling on this one so would prefer to see how it plays out for a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:14, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: excellent portrait, but I agree about exposure, especially on the beak, any way to dial it down? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but, yes, overexposed a bit Юрий Д.К. 18:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support, and agree about dialing down the exposure a smidge. Crop is fine, though I'm curious whether a 3x4 or 8x11 portrait crop would improve the composition (no idea how much space outside the crop your RAW has). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 19:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Wyoming
Info Dead tree trunk near the Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone. The spring itself is spectacular, of course (we have a couple FPs of it, I think), but my attention kept landing on these stark dead trees extending from the nearby ground of siliceous sinter (and the various microbes that color it). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- I'm very familiar with the area, and it's good to see a picture from Grand Prismatic Spring that shows another aspect of the feature. Acroterion (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. Nice --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:14, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 18:15:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
Info All by me. Stitched panorama, 22 400 × 7 467 px (167 MP). There is one FP of a related view, MontBlanc2c.jpg (2007, 18 MP), but the framing is different. I am not proposing a replacement. The two are complementary, and the 19-year gap also allows a comparison of the glaciers. -- Espandero (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Espandero (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment I was about to mention MontBlanc2c.jpg (It was taken by my friend and I was next to him, taking some much less impressive photos. Brings back memories!). This has a more fortunate lighting and clouds add some mystic. But it lacks room around the subject IMO. On closer inspection, I also notice Adobe still hasn't figured out processing Fuji's x-trans' RAW. You should give Iridient (or something else) a chance :) - Benh (talk) 18:35, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Per Benh. This is on the right track for becoming a FP, but needs more space to breathe! Also seems a but dull to me in regards of highlights/shadows. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:08, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Benh and Aciarium: on this specific file I have a little wiggle room of a few 100 pixels at the top, but I'm not sure it would really add to the picture. I also have the same photo taken with my 18mm but then it's not as detailed because it is not a panorama. In a way I feel the cloud left to the top makes it look tighter than it really is. I could upload a new version if you want. Espandero (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Yes, the crop is a bit tight, but the wealth of detail due to the high resolution is superior and is overwhelming me. --Milseburg (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Back in the days, the Mont Blanc du Tacul was an easy ascent, but as we can see here, it has become much more tricky. Yann (talk) 09:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the tight crop, epecially at the top, doesn't make justice to this awesome subject. Please check the white balance, which seems a bit displaced to the blue-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Benh, Aciarium and Alvesgaspar: I've uploaded a new version, using all the space I've got to the top. Once again I don't think the top is that tightly cropped, but the cloud gives that impression. --Espandero (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support, but I also feel the white balance should be a bit warmer. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 15:56:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: Zingaro coast; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support but there is a halo on the left side of the left house.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:08, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 15:02:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created and uploaded by Zysko serhii – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 15:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support An extremely saline lake, very interesting --Wilfredor (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice scene and good execution. This geometric, planar approach makes it look almost unnaturally minimalistic. I like it. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The slight ripples keep it from being too much of a tonal gradient, well done. Acroterion (talk) 03:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Minimalism at its finest. Controlled exposure, seamless color gradients, and a composition that quietly invites contemplation. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per anderen. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Je-str (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 14:56:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
Info created and uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:03, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Question This is an impressive picture, comparable to the ones made by our best macro photographers. But this result cannot be obtained with a single shot. If focus stacking was used, that should be mentioned in the image file. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Some regular FPC contributors do not always provide detailed documentation for their images, and questions about the techniques used may therefore remain unanswered. Since the photographer was not the person who nominated the image, they may not see this discussion, but one possible explanation is that several photographs were combined using an image-stacking technique. Whatever the method, the final result is impressive and would certainly be interesting to learn more about Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- First of all,
Strong support. Very good composition, pleasant colors, and – to state the obvious – incredible resolution. In this particular case, I don't think the missing retouched-picture tag is that big of an issue, since there are is no apparent reason not to assume good faith. Alvesgaspar and Wilfredor made me realize that maybe it would be a good idea to reconsider if and how such "etiquette" rules should be enforced in the future. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:40, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ever in QIC and also in FPC, contributors are generally encouraged to provide at least a proper English description, together with useful information such as geolocation, a panorama designation when applicable, complete EXIF data, the often-overlooked P180 statement, and appropriate categorization, italicized name on specimens, etc... Although many of these expectations are not formally written rules, they have gradually become established community practices over time. They help reviewers understand how an image was produced and properly document it, but they can also be confusing and burdensome for newcomers who may not yet be familiar with these unwritten conventions. More recently, however, a formal requirement was approved, the description must clearly state whether artificial intelligence was used, either partially or entirely, in creating the image. Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- First of all,
- Some regular FPC contributors do not always provide detailed documentation for their images, and questions about the techniques used may therefore remain unanswered. Since the photographer was not the person who nominated the image, they may not see this discussion, but one possible explanation is that several photographs were combined using an image-stacking technique. Whatever the method, the final result is impressive and would certainly be interesting to learn more about Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:04, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Je-str (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 14:52:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Indonesia
Info created and uploaded by Crisco 1492 – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support very well composed and unusual view of the temple. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as creator and per nom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support But perhaps you should have photographed the flowers in front of the object separately and then stacked them; the flowers would have been much sharper then.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- This is from my very early experience with DSLRs (13 months after I bought the camera) and I had not reached that point. Good idea for future efforts, though! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 12:55:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Ukraine#Zakarpattia Oblast
Info Carpathian Biosphere Reserve; Rakhiv, Tiachiv, Khust, and Vynohradiv districts. July 2016. Created by Estolyarov – uploaded by Estolyarov – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Beautifully captured. Ukraine is an amazing country in many respects. -- IamMM (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Beautiful scenery, and well balanced.--Paracel63 (talk) 06:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Super! Юрий Д.К. 18:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Sat, 15 Aug 2026 11:34:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support. Great composition, this image has a rhythm like music! -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral The white parts are still quite noisy and a bit overexposed. A very good photo nevertheless.-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I applied noise reduction and a slight brightness correction. Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful Юрий Д.К. 18:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 10:02:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created and uploaded by Yacoup almahdi – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark. Why PNG? Yann (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Yann Thank you for your review. It may be a little dark, but I think the horse details are still clearly visible. As for the PNG format, I'm not sure why the image was uploaded that way, since I'm not the photographer. I simply liked the picture and nominated it for Featured Picture. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:20, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I love these coffee tones and there's great detail even in the shadows. -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Hard to distinguish. Underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2026 at 04:21:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Switzerland
Info Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. The weather wasn't on our side, but even against the dark clouds it's an impressive castle for me.
-- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2026 at 19:57:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Chaetodontidae (Butterflyfishes)
Info Scrawled butterflyfish (Chaetodon meyeri), Nosy Kalakajoro, Madagascar. This species of butterflyfish is found at depths between 2–25 metres (6.6–82.0 ft) in the Indian and Pacific Oceans where it inhabits area rich in coral in clear lagoons and seaward reefs. It attains a maximum total length of 20 centimetres (7.9 in). Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons yet. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 23:59, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2026 at 12:38:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
Info Right brake light of the BMW Vision Efficient Dynamics. Created and uploaded by A,Ocram – nominated by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as nominator. IMO an excellent example of a close-up shot of a automobile. -- MB-one (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 15:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Useful image for the repository but not a FP in my view: busy background, harsh light, questionable composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Didn't realize it was a car at first -- successfully abstracted colorful, sleek shapes IMO. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)- BMW was truly ahead of its time with the i8 (and its preceding concept). Sadly, we don't see this design philosophy in today's production cars anymore: pleasant, futuristic, and immediately recognizable! Also, sadly, I need to give this a
Weak oppose; the composition isn't convincing to me and I think a lower angle would have been better. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- A good abstraction of an object that would be just another depiction if more had been shown. Acroterion (talk) 23:41, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Acroterion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per Rhododendrites. —brainandforce [yap] 07:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2026 at 06:18:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Family_:_Asteraceae_(Sunflowers)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support A bright sun, blue in the background. It's superb. --JackyM59 (talk) 09:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support For me, a beautiful angle and crop.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 15:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Don (talk) 23:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak support I preffer more DoF --Wilfredor (talk) 11:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:06, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:48, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:02, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 23:46:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
Info Gasometers for converter and blast furnace gas at the voestalpine steelplant in Linz, Austria, at night. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment - On the fence about this one for FP. QI, yes. FP... the street lamps and the branches are minor distractions. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:51, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose unfortunately per Chris Woodrich. --MB-one (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Noise, no tripod, ISO 2000... -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I shot this from the driver seat of my car to not raise too much suspicion of industry espionage. Will invest in a car window pod in the future ;) --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 09:04, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- The crop is also too tight at the bottom, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:46, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 22:36:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info The building "Colmarplatz 1" in Eisenstadt, Burgenland, Austria. I found the warm lighting and the shadow on the building's relief panels quite appealing. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice Shopping picture, but sorry. Trees on the left and at the top are in the way, the building on the right is cut off, people are distracting, the crop on the left side of the image is unfortunate, and the stop sign carries too much visual weight. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: You are right, there are a few issues with this image. Framing/perspective wasn't too easy on location because no matter the perspective, there was always something obstructing in the frame (so I had to choose the lesser evil between traffic sign in the center of the frame, and obstructing neighbor building at the border). However, I tried to at least improve the cropping issue a bit, still very much wishing that the house on the right wouldn't be there. By the way, the people in the foreground are an essential stylistic device to convey the characteristic "underpopulated city center of a small Austrian town on a sunday" feeling ;) --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 00:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You’ve done a good job, and the crop is better than before. Even so, I think that, despite correcting those details, there are still other issues. Of course, this is only my opinion, not an absolute truth. I’ve noticed that very few people on FPC leave comments or negative votes, especially photographers who are far more experienced than I am. In the past, there was more constructive criticism that helped people improve, but I suspect some stopped doing it after receiving retaliatory negative votes. I wanted to leave this comment not because I believe this photo could become a featured picture with a few adjustments, but because I think it may help you achieve a better result in your next shot. Sorry Wilfredor (talk) 11:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: Thank you! :) I absoutely didn't take your constructive criticism as an offense. In my reply, I wanted to provide some more insight into the situation on location, but in hindsight I understand that my choice of words may seem overly defensive – sorry about that! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- No, your wording was perfectly fine. I’m just careful with my own words because I know some people are more sensitive than others, and messages—especially criticism—can easily be misinterpreted depending on the tone people read into them. Thank you again for taking it so positively. You’ve officially been added to my list of pleasant users—although, to be honest, that list doesn’t actually exist. It’s just my way of saying that I appreciate your attitude. Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I appreciate it! :) Likewise, of course.
- With every new instance of retaliatory negative votes or comments that are uncalled for, the overall motivation of a user to express constructive criticism is further reduced and the transition of the community toward a positive echo chamber continues. You always need supportive comments for reassurance and constructive criticism for growth. One doesn't work without the other, especially when either of the two is unreflected. This also means that the FP project slowly loses its wonderful ability to help users improve their photography skills. Support votes are lightheartedly cast, almost by default, more and more often despite serious technical issues. Opposal is not expressed by casting an explicit oppose vote and providing concise feedback anymore, but by simply abstaining from voting. Therefore, users like you are of increasing value for this community, because you help others understand what exactly it is that they can improve. Looking forward to more valuable feedback on future nominations! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 01:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- No, your wording was perfectly fine. I’m just careful with my own words because I know some people are more sensitive than others, and messages—especially criticism—can easily be misinterpreted depending on the tone people read into them. Thank you again for taking it so positively. You’ve officially been added to my list of pleasant users—although, to be honest, that list doesn’t actually exist. It’s just my way of saying that I appreciate your attitude. Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: Thank you! :) I absoutely didn't take your constructive criticism as an offense. In my reply, I wanted to provide some more insight into the situation on location, but in hindsight I understand that my choice of words may seem overly defensive – sorry about that! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You’ve done a good job, and the crop is better than before. Even so, I think that, despite correcting those details, there are still other issues. Of course, this is only my opinion, not an absolute truth. I’ve noticed that very few people on FPC leave comments or negative votes, especially photographers who are far more experienced than I am. In the past, there was more constructive criticism that helped people improve, but I suspect some stopped doing it after receiving retaliatory negative votes. I wanted to leave this comment not because I believe this photo could become a featured picture with a few adjustments, but because I think it may help you achieve a better result in your next shot. Sorry Wilfredor (talk) 11:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: You are right, there are a few issues with this image. Framing/perspective wasn't too easy on location because no matter the perspective, there was always something obstructing in the frame (so I had to choose the lesser evil between traffic sign in the center of the frame, and obstructing neighbor building at the border). However, I tried to at least improve the cropping issue a bit, still very much wishing that the house on the right wouldn't be there. By the way, the people in the foreground are an essential stylistic device to convey the characteristic "underpopulated city center of a small Austrian town on a sunday" feeling ;) --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 00:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 21:18:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Portugal#Faro
Info: Das Poças beachlet; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 12:43:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Meals (food and drink)
Info Vigan Empanada is a very famous merienda food in the Ilocos Region (the Philippines). It's made of vegetables like papaya or cabbage, and also meat and egg. Created by Jessartcam – uploaded by Jessartcam – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: just a comment now, I'm not ready to vote yet. It looks very nice at first glance. However, there are at least two light sources: one on the top right and one on the top left. And one more to illuminate the crisscrossed pepper pods. The smoke or steam looks artificial. A lit incense stick was likely used to create so strong smoky effect. The initial wow factor is lost due to the obvious fakeness. -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Doubtless artificially lit, but nonetheless beautiful and attractive to me Cmao20 (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I think with something like food photography, I assume the setting to be heavily staged, and what matters to me is the final result. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:52, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Composition, colors, and details. The staging does not reduce the visual impact or cultural value. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Restaurants plate, photographers stage; it's the way of life with food presentation. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Quality food photography is just about always staged, and there's no prohibition against composed lighting at FP. Acroterion (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support The kind of picture you would find in a high-class cookbook (although I sometimes miss those early-2000s "Wikipedia food" photos)! Lighting isn't an issue to me, although the smoke is maybe a bit over the top. But the food itself looks natural and the picture succeeds at giving the viewer a very clear understanding of the dish. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 00:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Food photography is one of my favorite hobbies, both because I enjoy the creative process of taking the photo and because it gives me the opportunity to discover and experience unusual dishes. This image looks very appetizing, especially with its spicy character, which I particularly enjoy....mmmm. That said, and sorry for being a party pooper, the composition feels somewhat tight and confined. The limited space and cropped elements make the image appear slightly cluttered. Allowing more room around the dish and using a higher depth of field could create a more balanced. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I want an empanada now... —brainandforce [yap] 07:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:01, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 12:08:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info One of DXR's spectacular stitched church panoramas, showing excellent management of light and with many extraordinary details. No FPs of this historically important and beautiful church. created by DXR – uploaded by DXR – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Incomplete EXIF and verticals need correcting (added note) --Wilfredor (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Forget my comment., I hadn't noticed that you weren't the author of the photo—plus, there's Diliff's custom panorama template. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- of course the EXIF is incomplete, it's a stitched multi-row panorama, the same is true for all previous multirow church interior panoramas by DXR, Diliff, and Code. I cannot see any issue with the verticals, sorry. Cmao20 (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Please, Could you add the panorama template ({{panorama}}) and also place the camera model({{Camera Model}}). Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- of course the EXIF is incomplete, it's a stitched multi-row panorama, the same is true for all previous multirow church interior panoramas by DXR, Diliff, and Code. I cannot see any issue with the verticals, sorry. Cmao20 (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I'm looking where it's tagged, and I'm not seeing the vertical issue using my usual technique (seeing if the verticals are flush with the scrollbar in my browser). The columns themselves do not have a perfectly straight edge, but that's years of real-life usage rather than a photography issue. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Very well done --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:00, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 12:08:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info Nice reflection and good quality; no FPs from here. created by Roy Egloff – uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting thumbnail (light, mirror effect), striking image at full size (building, ruins, colors) -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2026 at 06:21:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Monticola
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose technically very good. But the dull fore- and background kills every "wow" for me. Sorry. --MB-one (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 20:53:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Cirrhitidae_(Hawkfishes)
Info Longnose hawkfish (Oxycirrhites typus), Nosy Antanimora, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the genus Oxycirrhites. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Great composition, quality, colours, everything really. Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellenet --Wilfredor (talk) 14:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Submarine beauty -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Must support long-nosed fish. Acroterion (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
London Underground Piccadilly line 1973 Tube Stock line scan
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 18:46:01 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by dllu -- dllu (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Info The train was accelerating significantly and I tried correcting it manually with my new software tool: File:Screenshot of dllu's line scan camera speed annotation tool.png. However, some residual distortion around 1% exists. Still, it should be a lot more accurate than existing FP such as File:Line scan photo of nine car BART C1 train in 2017.jpg which do not have this level of granular spline correction. Unfortunately, due to the backlit lighting and the 66 dB dynamic range of the AMS Dragster sensor, the wheels are black even in my 14 bit raw files with no chance of recovery (the same thing also happened to the BART image but I guess its wheels are just more shiny). The photo was captured through a narrow (1 inch) gap in a fence. Here's the capture setup: File:Alkeria Necta camera capturing 1973 Tube stock dllu.jpg. The lens used was a Voigtlander Apo Skopar 90mm f/2.8 with a Kolari Vision IR-cut filter. The IR filter improves color accuracy significantly compared to earlier line scan photos. dllu (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:57, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I actually quite like these, but I don't think we need it as six separate FPs when their value is primarily together. I'd support a combined image, with the understanding that Wikipedias or other reusers will probably be relying on the split versions. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah I think that makes sense. The question is whether I should: 1. concatenate them horizontally 2. stack them vertically with cuts between the train cars 3. stack them vertically equally spaced. The problem with 1 is that firstly, the thumbnails are impossible to see, and secondly, many software cannot display it. For example, the popular imlib [1] caps at 32767 px regardless of image format. JPEG has a limitation of 65535 px. For File:Line scan photo of Shinkansen N700A Series Set G13 in 2017.png I had to use PNG to avoid the 65535 px limitation, although that is also downsampled to 1640 px height rather than the native 4096 px. Next, the problem with the second approach is that each image has different width, particularly the cab cars which may either be physically a different length or I might leave extra "lead space" in front of them. So you'll end up with black bars like so: [2]. I wouldn't mind doing the last approach, like so [3], which is honestly the easiest. Finally, combining them all into one image has the risk of failing to display with popular image viewers, including Google Chrome, which limits to about 536 megapixels in total [4], i.e. 23170 x 23170, which this capture would exceed. I could also downsample the images, but that would be in contravention of COM:I which states "Images should not be downsampled". Let me know which strategy you'd prefer. dllu (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- My inclination would be to make one long image, downsampling to the extent necessary to make it technically possible, featuring that version, and then offering a variety of other options for people to use, depending on their application? — Rhododendrites talk | 15:38, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah I think that makes sense. The question is whether I should: 1. concatenate them horizontally 2. stack them vertically with cuts between the train cars 3. stack them vertically equally spaced. The problem with 1 is that firstly, the thumbnails are impossible to see, and secondly, many software cannot display it. For example, the popular imlib [1] caps at 32767 px regardless of image format. JPEG has a limitation of 65535 px. For File:Line scan photo of Shinkansen N700A Series Set G13 in 2017.png I had to use PNG to avoid the 65535 px limitation, although that is also downsampled to 1640 px height rather than the native 4096 px. Next, the problem with the second approach is that each image has different width, particularly the cab cars which may either be physically a different length or I might leave extra "lead space" in front of them. So you'll end up with black bars like so: [2]. I wouldn't mind doing the last approach, like so [3], which is honestly the easiest. Finally, combining them all into one image has the risk of failing to display with popular image viewers, including Google Chrome, which limits to about 536 megapixels in total [4], i.e. 23170 x 23170, which this capture would exceed. I could also downsample the images, but that would be in contravention of COM:I which states "Images should not be downsampled". Let me know which strategy you'd prefer. dllu (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose: while I understand the rational of splitting the image, it makes no sense to me to promote 4 essentially identical images (middle cars). Would support a truncated set. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose And I might have supported a single stitched picture with the whole train. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:51, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with The Cosmonaut Poco a poco (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Alvesgaspar and Rhododendrites: I can easily produce a combined single image. Let me know if you'd prefer: 1. horizontal 2. vertically stacked by equal width strips 3. vertically stacked by train cars (with black bars at either side for unequal lengths of train cars). Also, I'd just like to point out that the official FPC guidelines say that "crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan" should be nominated as a set. To me, it's just a single image; the fact that it's cut up is just a workaround for a technical limitation. dllu (talk) 20:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Rhododendrites and others -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any thoughts on my comment above? dllu (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- As the images are very similar, I don't see the set as something incredible. Redundancy in my view. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Milseburg (talk) 14:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment It's very impressive and quite unique (I wonder how many people in the world have the skills to take this kind of photo). The viewing angle is a bit oblique but looks like you did not have much of a choice. Missing wheels are unfortunate :(. A scrollable version like you provided for the other train slitscan shots would be great. - Benh (talk) 18:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Let's withdraw this until we can come to a consensus on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates. dllu (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 17:37:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed
Info created by Gordon Ross. – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 17:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 17:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support An interesting glimpse into the concerns of satirists in a different era. Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 17:31:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo_techniques/Black_and_White#Building_exteriors or Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo_techniques/Black_and_White#Towns_and_cities
Info Anyone who has seen my ouevre knows I don't normally do black-and-white or monochrome. However, I felt that this scene was definitely worth it: it's a narrow alley between two 19th-century blocks, with the trappings of modern urban living. The eye follows the lines of the alley into the shadows... what hides there? Overall, I think it has a very strong ambience that the monochrome presentation supports. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:42, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! Excellent mood and composition. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Great composition. The monochrome presentation enhances the textures, geometry, and atmosphere, while the perspective draws the eye naturally through the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support An excellent use of black and white to highlight texture and atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 10:20, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Great exposition of back-alley creepiness at night.--Paracel63 (talk) 06:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Creepy! Юрий Д.К. 17:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:27:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Pyrénées
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2026 (UTC)- Wouldn't it be good to crop or clone that blurry object in the bottom
leftright corner? But regardless,
Support. Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support But per Cmao20 (I think he meant the bottom right corner) --Llez (talk) 17:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I did, yes, sorry about that. Cmao20 (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:58, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:24:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Despite the grey sky, nice colors and good composition. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Not as high resolution as the existing FP, but a wider view and very different light. Both can be featured IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose An impressibe building and a well composed photo. But light is not the best, resulting in dull colours and small contrast. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Cmao20 -- IamMM (talk) 15:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I've to agree with Alvesgaspar Poco a poco (talk) 13:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Very good and efficient as usual, but the light is dull. I'm very sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Great architecture, but non-cooperative cloudy sky, and unappealing light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Dull light. Unfortunate conditions. --Milseburg (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:56, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:10:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species : Vulpes vulpes (Red Foxes)
Info Wild red fox in Island Beach State Park, US. Created by Flickr user Anthony Quintano – uploaded by Tm – nominated by LetmeEditit -- LetmeEditit (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LetmeEditit (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support - I'd have preferred a bit looser of a crop, but still very nice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Very cute and overall good but I'm not fully convinced this is FP when a lot of it, including the eyes and nose, are not in focus. I also suspect the white balance is too warm. Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp, too tight crop, white balance probably off. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Cute but problem of DoF, and tight crop -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Nice, but technical issues Юрий Д.К. 17:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 06:41:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Dicruridae_(Drongos)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support What a sharpness! -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition LetmeEditit (talk) 10:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 11:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Renfe AVE Class 102 Talgo 350 line scan Madrid 2018
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:51:24 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
power car
-
B cars
-
T cars
-
Cafe and T car
-
T cars
-
T cars
-
power car
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Spain
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Going through my backlog of photos. Much better quality than existing line scan FP such as File:Line scan photo of Shinkansen N700A Series Set G13 in 2017, car 01.png. However, the purple line and text are a bit washed out despite my best efforts, because I didn't have the IR-block filter at the time. dllu (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support These images still look like taken at light speed (or when the motif travels as fast as that) :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support I really admire your work; I'm familiar with this technique. Although I prefer it in a single image (personal preference), I suppose that might make it harder to view as a thumbnail. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- A single horizontal image would be 125,000 px wide which exceeds the limits of many file formats. For example JPEG has a limit of 65535 px. In practice, many image viewers, including popular browsers like Google Chrome, fail to display high resolution images (e.g. this Chrome bug [5] where images more than about 536 megapixels can't be displayed). I could also stack the train or cut at equal widths like so: [6] if anyone prefers that. It's also common on some Wikipedia articles to have a photo per car of the train, e.g. E235 series#Exterior, so having the images cut up by car has a practical purpose. dllu (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe using png could be done or you would cut it into pieces that overlap (the typical way of stitching photos for a panorama) so that someone in the future could join them together if they wanted to. Wilfredor (talk) 01:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- There's no need for overlap. Combining them into one image is trivially done by concatenating the pieces. They already fit together perfectly. dllu (talk) 02:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe using png could be done or you would cut it into pieces that overlap (the typical way of stitching photos for a panorama) so that someone in the future could join them together if they wanted to. Wilfredor (talk) 01:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- A single horizontal image would be 125,000 px wide which exceeds the limits of many file formats. For example JPEG has a limit of 65535 px. In practice, many image viewers, including popular browsers like Google Chrome, fail to display high resolution images (e.g. this Chrome bug [5] where images more than about 536 megapixels can't be displayed). I could also stack the train or cut at equal widths like so: [6] if anyone prefers that. It's also common on some Wikipedia articles to have a photo per car of the train, e.g. E235 series#Exterior, so having the images cut up by car has a practical purpose. dllu (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support for the entire impressive set. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose: while I understand the rational of splitting the image, it makes no sense to me to promote 4 essentially identical images (middle cars). Would support a truncated set. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Maybe as a single stitched image. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per The Cosmonaut Poco a poco (talk) 13:59, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Same as Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/London Underground Piccadilly line 1973 Tube Stock line scan. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Per dllu. Technical limitations. Separated images are also useful. --Steven Sun (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose can we have just seperate nom. --Mile (talk) 14:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Separated images are useful, but I'm opposed to FP sets where the individual FPs do not stand on their own. (As per the other nom). — Rhododendrites talk | 18:38, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Let's withdraw this until we can come to a consensus on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates. dllu (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:41:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:39:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 01:54:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
Info created and uploaded by J.Abisolon – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support, though I think Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo_techniques/Black_and_White#Objects would be a better target gallery. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment +1, I agree with Chris. I took the liberty of changing the gallery link to the one he suggested. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I don't see the reason for black and white here, and the shallow depth of field plus visible blurry spot on the lens mean this isn't FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I like it, and appreciate the B&W choice, though I do think the DOF is unfortunate -- I want hat detail! :) — Rhododendrites talk | 18:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 02:04:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Association football (soccer)
Info created and uploaded by Berlination – nominated by ★ -- ★ 02:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 02:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 06:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment I think this photo is superior without any doubt, but I also think that images like File:Spain team celebrating Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-337.jpg, File:Dani Olmo Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-346.jpg, File:Alex Grimaldo Spain team Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-351.jpg show more emotion (maybe more "wow"), while your nomination is more documenting the celebration as whole. Any way, I think one of these images will be promoted :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Btw, I was about to nominate of these images either :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Very good, but I believe the arm on the left should be cropped out --Benji 16:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment A pity that the president is not shown on this photo. Was he cloned off?... :)) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Visibly tilted and has half a guy's arm on the left hand side (with clear red colour fringing too). Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Alternative added as suggested by PantheraLeo1359531. ★ 20:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The composition is too tight; besides, Trump is missing. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Wilfredor about the composition, sorry Cmao20 (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:19:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Places
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support B&W fitted very well. ★ 10:18, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Dull lighting. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 20:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 07:56:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pas-de-Calais
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I don't think Category "Views from Cap Blanc-Nez" is correct. It's a view of the cap. --Milseburg (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you. It's corrected. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I like the compo of the background but I find the foreground, which is 60% of the image unappealing, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I understand the remark. It was not obvious to have a foreground without tourists. I took a step back. I hesitated to present this photo with goelands in the foreground:this one -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, this one is better. I would crop a bit at the bottom, then it would be great. Yann (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
InfoCap Blanc-Nez (Escalles) seen from the beach at low tide.
Comment: To take the comments into account, I am proposing another version with a different foreground. -- JackyM59 (talk) 15:07, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Better than above. Yann (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This one too.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This version is FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 21:06:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info All by iMahesh (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Good, but
Needs more categories. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @Aciarium: I've added a few categories. iMahesh (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- @I.Mahesh: Thank you, looks good now.
Support. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 07:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- @I.Mahesh: Thank you, looks good now.
- Hello @Aciarium: I've added a few categories. iMahesh (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Well framed and high quality capture of eclectic and interesting architecture Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Very detailed, this is really rewarding for this fascinating building with its many interesting details. The light from the side nicely emphasizes the sculptures, ornaments etc. – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 02:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:49, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Ludwigsburg Palace 11.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 17:54:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Great architectural photo. If there’s anything that could be improved, it’s at most the small tree on the right edge, which is slightly cropped out. -- XRay 💬 18:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I would low Luminance of Orange/yellow and solve CA around antennas/borders, right side. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support The obvious thing would have been to take a centered shot, but the result would have been rather boring with that light; therefore the asymmetric framing was an excellent idea – it makes most of the light and gives a good impression of the court. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 03 Aug → Sat 08 Aug Tue 04 Aug → Sun 09 Aug Wed 05 Aug → Mon 10 Aug Thu 06 Aug → Tue 11 Aug Fri 07 Aug → Wed 12 Aug Sat 08 Aug → Thu 13 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 30 Jul → Sat 08 Aug Fri 31 Jul → Sun 09 Aug Sat 01 Aug → Mon 10 Aug Sun 02 Aug → Tue 11 Aug Mon 03 Aug → Wed 12 Aug Tue 04 Aug → Thu 13 Aug Wed 05 Aug → Fri 14 Aug Thu 06 Aug → Sat 15 Aug Fri 07 Aug → Sun 16 Aug Sat 08 Aug → Mon 17 Aug
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:August 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
